The point of the 'all-in-one' time to investigate the victim's caricature has been released

The point of the 'all-in-one' time to investigate the victim's caricature has been released. However, the two suspicions of the case remain unclear and still leave doubts.

On the afternoon of the 16th, MBC Sangam MBC in Seoul held a press conference concluding the investigation committee activities on the controversy over the "

On the spot, there are a number of lawyers, including Oh Se-bum, a lawyer for the truth investigation committee, Cho Yong-hee, chief of planning and organizing department, I attended.

The MBC entertainment program broadcast on the last five days of the 'all-in-one point of view' broadcasting the scene of Lee Youngja's eating fishmeal, while the subtitles of 'breaking news, do not eat fishcake, shock confession' It was.

In order to investigate the suspicions related to the use of the news screen of the month of the "time of the war," MBC mobilized up to six lawyers to investigate the facts of the investigation, I finished the investigation.

On this day, the commission of truth investigation said, "It is difficult to judge that an assistant has made a mess of silk with deliberate ridicule or caricature. But it can not be seen as a simple mistake of an assistant. "The use of social disasters in programs that convey laughter can undermine the ethics of broadcasting and make it impossible to avoid severe punishment," the production crew said.

However, immediately after the announcement of the survey, two questions were not answered. The first is a suspicion of being the best member of the day, the starting point of the case ("Ilves"). In fact, this is the core of the case. As mentioned above, at the site, the word "fish cake" was used as a reminder to insult the family of the Seowol family. The editorial of "The City of All Things" was more intentional.

In order to solve the suspicion, the fact-finding committee investigated the explanation of the actor, the katok, the social network, and the surrounding reputation, and the investigation found that the actor was not deliberate. According to the fact-finding committee, the assistant insisted that he did not know the word "fish cake", which is a word to dismiss the family. This is also not understood. I am surprised that I was not aware of this controversy, which was a hot topic online as a broadcaster who leads a trendy entertainment program. In addition, there are some reports that even the broadcasts disparage the victims of the Il - Vega Seawall.

In fact, it is felt that there is somewhat lack of confidence in the survey because the statement and surrounding reputation of the assistant are subjective. SNS, which is the most objective data, can be made anonymous. The investigation committee explained that it confirmed the Katok group room belonging to a total of 14 people including the assistant director, the FD, and the art department. The contents of 5 of 14 katok have been received and compared, but the record was not found.

As suspicions continued to be raised in the course of the investigation, the fact-finding committee said, "It was an investigation, not an investigation. Investigation is deeply possible, but research is limited. I can not go further in this part unless I have provided proof of Ilvera. "He said he did his best in limited circumstances.

Another point is that I am wondering why I chose to use the footage of the last 10 news releases. FD sent a total of 200 news footage that included the anchor's remarks to the assistant, "It's breaking news," "Good news," and "I'll look at the scene atmosphere." Ten of them were 'breaking news' and there were two scenes of the disaster report of the problem. In fact, the fact-finding committee explained that "MBC should have been a news report, and it was a breaking news of the bust shot of the announcer." .

If there was not enough data related to 'breaking news', it would have been possible to replace it with a scene other than the report of the disaster. This is because of the production directed to attract the audience's interest.

The reason why I did not know that the scene would be a problem in the final preview, in which the CP, the director, and the writer participated, was that I could not find out what the scene was because it was blurred in about 5 seconds. In the end, the carelessness of the production crew spread through the CRT. This has also revealed the problems of MBC production process such as division of editing, reporting system of using gap, and carelessness.

The fact-finding committee demanded that disciplinary measures be taken against the director, director, director, general manager, who was responsible for the violation of the broadcasting ethics responsibility as a broadcaster, judging that the producers of "